Sunday, November 20, 2016

DELIVERY IN SALES CONTRACTS

OUTLINE/ LECTURE ON ISSUES ON DELIVERY IN SALES CONTRACTS

By: Atty. Eduardo T. Reyes, III

(Prepared for Law 4-C, 
University of San Agustin Law School,
 Civil Law Review II, SY 2016-2017)


I. Foundational Considerations in Sales Transactions


DIMENSION 1
DIMENSION 2
DIMENSION 3
Negotiation
Perfection; Meeting of the Minds
Consummation
Contract to Sell
Conditional Sale/ Absolute Sale
Delivery
Positive Suspensive Condition
Rescission (Arts. 1191 & 1592, New Civil Code)


Effect of Maceda Law


-Contract to Sell, Conditional Sale & Absolute Sale; Distinguished

- Rescission (Check discussion on Art 1191 on need for Judicial Rescission and exception thereto in the lecture hand-out in Obligations & Contracts).

- Effect of Maceda Law


Article 1478. The parties may stipulate that ownership in the thing shall not pass to the purchaser until he has fully paid the price.

Article 1479. A promise to buy and sell a determinate thing for a proce certain is reciprocally demandable.

An accepted unilateral promise to buy or to sell a determinate thing for a price certain is binding upon the promissory if the promise is supported by a consideration distinct from the price.


            In Ong v. Court of Appeals[1], these different kinds of sales transactions were distinguished in this fashion, viz:


            “In a contract of sale, the title to the property passes to the vendee upon the delivery of the thing sold; while in a contract to sell, ownership is, by agreement, reserved in the vendor and is not to pass to the vendee until full payment of the purchase price. In a contract to sell, the payment of the purchase price is a positive suspensive condition, the failure of which is not a breach, casual or serious, but a situation that prevents the obligation  of the vendor to convey title from acquiring an obligatory force. The non-fulfillment of the condition of full payment rendered the contract to sell ineffective and without force and effect. It must be stressed that the breach contemplated in Article 1191 of the New Civil Code is the obligor’s failure to comply with an obligation already extant, not a failure of a condition to render binding that obligation. Failure to pay, in this instance, is not even a breach but merely an event which prevents the vendor’s obligation to convey title from acquiring binding force.”


“A contract to sell may not even be considered as a conditional contract of sale where the seller likewise reserves title to the property subject of the sale until the fulfillment of a suspensive consition, because in a conditional contract of sale, the first element of consent is present, although it is conditioned upon the happening of a contingent event which may or may not occur. If the suspensive condition is not fulfilled, the perfection of the contract of sale is completely abated. However, if the suspensive condition is fulfilled, the contract of sale is thereby perfected, such that if there had already been previous delivery of the property subject of the sale to the buyer, ownership thereto automatically transfers to the buyer by operation of law without any further act of having to be performed by the seller.

            In contract to sell, upon the fulfillment of the suspensive condition which is the full payment of the purchase price, ownership will not automatically transfer to the buyer although the property may have been previously deliverd to him. The prospective buyer has to convey title to the prospective buyer by entering into a contract of absolute sale.[2]
            Art.15387. the vendor is bound to deliver the thing sold and its accessions and accessories in the conditions in which they were upon the perfection of the contract.
            All the fruits shall pertain to the vendee from the day on which the contract was perfected.
II. TRADITION OR DELIVERY – Art. 1497 When the thing sold “ placed in the contract and   possession of the vendee.
1497 to 1501
Actual vs. Constructive delivery
Art. 1498 – Were the execution of the deed of conveyance in a public instrument is equivalent to the delivery of the property. (Sabio v.  International Corporate Bank,  364SCRA 365 [2001])
                               Exceptions: 1. “when there is a stipulation in the instrument to the contrary”
2. Doctrine in Addison V. Felix (38 Phil. 404 (1918). “  It is the duty of the seller to deliver the thing sold, and that symbolic delivery by the execution by the execution of public instrument is equivalent to actual delivery  only when the thing sold is subject to the control of the seller, so that “at the moment  of sale, its material delivery could have been made.”
-  Doctrine reiterated in Power Commercial and Industrial Corp. v. CA, 274 SCRA 597, (1997).
                       
Exception to Exception: If the sale have been made under the express   agreement of imposing upon buyer the obligation of recovering possession from third part possessors.

I. Performance or Consummation
            Art. 1458, By the Contract of Sale one of the contracting parties obligates himself to transfer the ownership of and to deliver the determinate thing, and the other to pay therefore a price certain in money or its equivalent.
           
            Art. 1495, The vendor is bound to transfer the ownership of and deliver, as well as warrant the thing which is the object of the sale.

            Art. 1163, every person obliged to give a determinate thing is also obliged to take care of it with the proper diligence  of a good father , of a family, unless the law on the stipulation of the parties requires anther standard of care.
(Buyer and Sale)
Art. 1164, The creditors has the right to the fruit of the thing from the time n the obligation to deliver arises. However, he shall acquire no real right over it until the same has been delivered to him.

(Doctrine of Self – Help)

Consequence of Delivery: Art. 429 the owner or lawful processor of a thing has the right to exclude any person from the enjoyment and disposal thereof. For this purpose, he may use such force as may be reasonably necessary to repel or prevent an actual or threatened unlawful physical invasion or usurpation of his property.

III. Symbolic Delivery, Constitution Possessorium, Tradition Brevi Manu, Tradition Longa   Manu.

IV. Delivery by Negotiable Document of Title

V. Delivery through Courier

      5.1 Art. 1523 – Delivery is allowed for the contract to be made to a carrier – equivalent to delivery to buyer.

Exception:

      Art. 1503 (1) (2) (3)

(1)  Sale with Reservation of Title.
(2) Goods are shipped and Bill of Lading is Deliverable to seller or his agent (Implies that the title is reserved by seller.)
(3) Goods are Shipped and Bill of Lading is deliverable to buyer or his agent BUT possess of bill of lading is retained by seller.
5.2 F. A. S.  Sales – seller pays all charges and is subject to risk until the goods are placed   “alongside the vessel.”

       F. O. B. – Free or Board – seller shall bear all expenses
                             FOB at the point of Shipment
                             FOB at the point of destination

Then ownership is deemed transferred to owner.

     C.I. F. Cost Insurance Freight
                 - Buyer pays CIF – Delivery and Carrier is enough.

VI. Completeness of Delivery

     Art. 1522 – Quantity Issues of Sale and Goods (Personal Property)
(a) Seller delivers quatity less than promised
a.1 buyer may reject
a.2 if buyer accept or retains he must pay the full price.
(b) if however buyer has used or disposed of goods delivered before he knows that seller is not going to perform
                        (c) seller delivers larger Quantity
                            - buyer may accept goods covered by contract and reject the rest
                            - if buyer accepts whole goods, he must pay based on contracts rates.
                            - if indivisible, buyer may reject whole of goods.

                        (d) if Mixed: those covered by contracts and those not described.
                                    - buyer may accept and reject those not described
                                    - if indivisible, buyer may reject the goods altogether.

VII. Sale of Immovable

            Art. 1539
-        Sale with statement of area per unit or measure
-        Seller is obliged to deliver that area stated in contract
-        If not possible buyer may choose: proportional reduction of price
     Rescission
At least 1/10th for rescission: (provided that lack of area is NOT LESS than 1/10 of area stated)
                                                   (Quantity Test)

          In an August 2016 case, it was ruled that:

            “What defines land; Land sold in LUMP SUM

            At any rate, we have consistently held that what really defines a piece of land is not the area, calculated with more or less certainty , mentioned in   the description, but its boundaries laid down, as enclosing the land and indicating its limits. Where land is sold for a lump sum and not so much per unit or measure, number, the boundaries of the land stated in the contract determine the effects and scope of the sale, and not its area. This is consistent with Article 1542 of the Civil Code which provides:

X x x”[3].


          Art. 1543- Actions arising from Articles 1539 & 1542 prescribe in 6 months from the day of delivery.

QUANTITY TEST

-        If Subject Matter delivered is NOT OF THE SAME QUALITY as agreed upon
-        Proportional reduction of price
Rescission (provided that inferior value of thing sold exceeds one tenth of the price agreed upon.
-        More than 1/10.

VIII. Time and Place of Delivery

  Gen. Rule: Stipulation in Contract

  In case of silence:

                        Time: Reasonable Time
                        Place: Art. I521 in rel. to Art. 1251
                                    Place of Business or if none
                                    Domicile of Seller/Debtor

IX. Condition and Warranties
            (Subject and another outline)

X. Extinguishment of Sales

-        Conventional Redemption – latest case law Cebu State College of Science and Technology (CSCST) etc. v Luis & Misterio, G.R. No. 179025, June 17, 2015.
-        Legal Redemption
(Subject of another Outline)








   

           







[1] 310 SCRA 1, 108 SCAD 706 (1999)
[2] See Homesite and Housing Corp. v. Court of Appeals, 133 SCRA 77 [1984]) and Coronel et al v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 103577, October 7, 1996
[3] Anita U. Lorensana v. Rodolfo Lelina, G.R. No. 187850, August 17, 2016

No comments:

Post a Comment